It is commonly believed that children being the future of nation should be well mannered. However, now question arise, who should be accountable for their becoming noble members of society, either parents or schools. Here, both sides of this assertion will be scrutinised with my proper vedict at last.
To commence with, it is primary duty of guardians to teach young ones to be good members of community. They should, from their childhood, make them more ethical and moral by inducing values like respect and obedience. Therefore, it is phase in which one can mould and shape up child in a systematic way. To illustrate, recent research has proved that the juvelines behavior depend mostly on parents and can be changed with some effort. Hence, procreates are responsible for developing them into respectful part of community.
Nevertheless, despite of parents teachers also plays an imperative part in kids life. As, in this busy world both parents are working, so, they are sent to school from starting. They spend four to five hours with teachers, which means a lot of time. In schools, children interact with teachers, students and other staff members, that develops various skill in them. And, ultimately become friendly to everyone. For instance, young ones going to school are better communication, conduct and are away from unacceptable habits. Deducing, not only parents but also schools are equally vital in childs growth.
In my opinion, as I aforementioned child cannot evolve without support of both guardians and schools. Thus, if any one of them is missing, young ones cannot be transformed into worthy members of ideal society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a systematic way" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... which one can mould and shape up child in a systematic way. To illustrate, recent research has pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17537313433 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66991887662 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664179104478 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.8607178729 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5882352941 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220138073648 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632890567081 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553817597804 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132426832429 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593095494696 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.