Humans have been utilising nature resources from hundreds of years and due to their negligence health of environment is deteriorated. Whereas, researchers have warned people to safeguard their surroundings, they have to lessen the use of energy. But, people are unaffected by all these warnings. Here, I shall scrutinise reasons and solutions to solve this issue in upcoming crumbs.
Admittedly, environment must be our priorty, but due to modern life style, people have totall forgotten it. They want to lead a luxurious life because of which, they are using energy extensively. Individuals have become habitual to live a comfortable life, as they cannot sleep without air condition or heater. Moreover, people in rural area are not aware about annihilation, they are causing to nature, and its dangerous repercussions. People are utilising non-renewable sources of energy such as coal and petroleum not deliberately because they don't even know about the hazardous effects on environment. Thus, if this is continued nothing will be left in few years.
However, solution to this can be applied effectively with assistance of government. As, they have power to make hard and fast rules to stop excessive usage of energy. To illustrate, local bodies can keep chech on energy usage for domestic and industrial purposes. They can make masses aware by organising conferences or summit-meetings. Furthermore, people also have accountability towards, their environment. They should opt for green energy resources and reduce the wastage, which will save power and make surroundings better. Hence, both state and its denizens should do some collective effort to reverse this trend.
In conclusion, to save natural resources, lowering the energy usage is must, else earth will be worse place to live. While, if aforementioned steps are taken this problem can be solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 548, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...petroleum not deliberately because they dont even know about the hazardous effects o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4295532646 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00209537008 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639175257732 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9940634783 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.1578947368 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256695467441 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734091444726 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504288020535 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147647036013 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594123912528 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.