Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that whether people should have a steady job or switch jobs frequently in order to have a job satisfaction. While the latter suits many people, I believe that the former is more beneficial.
On the one hand, job hopping is advantageous to some extent. Firstly, people who change their jobs frequently can acquire skills from many different jobs so that they can put knowledge gained from the previous jobs into practice and thus gain recognition from their peers. Secondly, switching job creates a good opportunity for job hoppers to discover the type of job which suits them. For example, young people who dislike a desk job may seek other outdoor jobs for more satisfaction.
On the other hand, I believe that having a steady job guarantees a better job satisfaction. One reason is that people can benefit from job prospects. As the company takes experience and commitment into consideration when they decide job promotions or pay rises. Besides, by staying for a long time in the same company, they have a chance to be given some perks such as sick leave, holiday entitlements, a generous retirement package or yearly bonuses. In addition to those perks, it also allows them precious time to nurture the relationships with their colleagues who might become their best friends in their lives later.
In conclusion, while trying out various jobs and sticking to one job are both advantageous in some ways but it seems to me that having a steady job is better to have a satisfaction in the career life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...jobs frequently can acquire skills from many different jobs so that they can put knowledge gai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88030888031 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73438681338 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7597951009 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229934986358 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918104188984 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532310437197 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157876304531 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248448682586 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.