The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals believe that raising the price of fuel is the best way to tackle global environmental issues. While this method is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that it is not the most effective way to alleviate international environmental problems.
On the one hand, making it more expensive to purchase petrol is useful for several reasons. The first one is that by adopting this policy, national authorities will make sure that people would use cars less. This measure means a reduction in the exhaust emissions which are responsible for global warming and greenhouse effects. Secondly, if the price of gasoline is higher, the depletion of natural resources will be reduced. As the world supplies of oil will not last forever so the less we use fossil fuels, the more helpful we are to the environment.
On the other hand, I believe that there are better ways to deal with international environmental issues. Firstly, introducing a restriction on the use of private vehicles must be high on the government agenda. For example, the congestion charge in some countries has made the air pollution decrease significantly. Secondly, it is necessary for the international bodies to allocate resources to the development of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar or tidal energy. In addition, every individual ought to raise their awareness of protecting environment by using their own vehicles as little as possible.
In conclusion, while raising petrol’s price is welcomed in some ways, it seems to me that there are more effective measures to deal with the global environmental issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21923076923 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02839373911 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580769230769 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0001183429 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.384615385 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116532791654 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438939500403 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642465902129 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837535158568 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832896785808 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.