Some people think that planting trees in open spaces in cities and towns is more important than building houses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is important to turn our urban landscape into a naturally habitable zone since trees help to make the surroundings more greener around houses and tall artificial structures. Although many people would argue the actual benefits of tree plantation in cities, I am of the opinion that it is more suitable to life in a jungle than the polluted cities that we live in, since this adversely affects our physical and mental health.
The planning of cities and towns should carefully account for the people living within it, hence there should be open areas for them to relax as well as safari parts and recreational zones away from the hustle and bustle of the city. In addition to this, many modern settlements often suffer from visual pollution, air pollution and noise pollution, hence trees and areas of constructed sites would make it easier for people to relax. Furthermore, these woodlands will also increase the sustainability and outlook of the city.
On the other hand, cities often have too many roads, buildings and commercial center, which are always in a state of chaos and confusion. In order to improve the spiritual and mental health of the living beings in the city, creating green zones which only have natural plantations will enable people to take the day off and enjoy the blessings of mother nature. Following this, a series of improvements can be made withing the city infrastructure such as planting trees on the footpaths and also on the rooftops. For example, Bangkok has transformed itself from being a concrete maze to a green heaven on earth.
All in all, cities are the lifeblood of the country and if the atmosphere of the city is not congenial to the people living there, then these cities will become unhealthy and overall development will suffer. Hence, it is my opinion that cities should be carefully planned by using greener establishments strategically in areas where pollution is higher.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greener' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greener
...nce trees help to make the surroundings more greener around houses and tall artificial struc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, then, well, as for, for example, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00309597523 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66853310382 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2361249107 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.909090909 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3636363636 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161797795225 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565073332191 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378337423502 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955666245388 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227421453251 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.