Whether politics or science rules the world is still up for debate. A large part of the opinion claim that politicians play a major role in shaping the destiny of a country, while other sustain that scientists actually lead a nation. The aim of this essay is to examine those two different points of view and explain why a strict cooperation between the two fronts is essential for the well of the citizens.
Since the ancient times, humans have tried to give themselves some forms of government. The longing for a charismatic leader or the perfect society is as old as the mankind itself and it has lead to uncountable political experiments, from monarchy to dictatorship to anarchy. Most of them have failed and some of them have also left dramatic footprints on the history. Democracy can be considered as the last step of this path. As we can see form the examples above, politics has always been a constant in the human chronicles. Science has become to rise only from the beginning of the 19th century. Until this period, the authority of politicians - whether they were kings, queens, or representatives - was immense. It was not unusual for scientist to be charged or arrested for publishing theories in contrast with the common belief.
It took decades for science to find its place in the society and to achieve independence form politics. Yet only in the 20th century scientists have gained a key position in disparate fields, from medicine to spacial engineering. As a consequence, living standard have dramatically improved, fueled by steady technological progress. Given all that, there is no doubt that science has a great influence on the conditions of a country.
Nevertheless, the rule of politicians should not be underestimated. Effective leadership is always on of the most primary drivers for growth, development, and innovation. Only through a careful legislation and a wise allocation of financial resources scientist can reach their fullest potential and work for the citizens well-being. Furthermore, politics should also regulate experimentation in order to avoid misuse of treatments that can turn out to be harmful for human beings and animals.
In conclusion, the key role to create a strong, reliable, and efficient society is the cooperation between science and politics. To keep running the engine of a society needs skilled scientists and prepared politicians. The first ones by creating cutting edge technologies, the second ones by managing properly financial revenues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...timated. Effective leadership is always on of the most primary drivers for growth,...
^^
Line 6, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...tion and a wise allocation of financial resources scientist can reach their fullest poten...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1921182266 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03284832682 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57881773399 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6653407235 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8181818182 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128757578959 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340780874282 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405280422725 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646087119978 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379313541567 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.