The economic gap between developed and poor countries has dramatically increased during the last decades. Unfortunately, such disparities in income are paralleled by other non-monetary gaps. especially in the medical and energetic fields. Several studies have been carried out which effectively depict the widening gap between poor and rich nations, underlining the striking inequality expressed by the GDP. To giv the reader a tangible exemple, according to a recent data from a survey conducted in 2019, the GDP of Qatar is over 130.000 dollars against the roughly 1000 of Eritrea. It is not diffiuclt to realize therefore that behind cold figures, lie untold miseries of million of human beings.
All of these rather glooming aspects, howevever should not blind us to the fact that actions have been tacken to curb poverty and to reduce the economic inequality. Developed countries like the USA and China has been investing large amounts of money in developing countries. International organizations like ONU, UNICEF and FAO supply poor nations with food, medicines, medical equipments, vaccines and help to develop unstable economies. Wheter providing financial aid is better than exchanching knoweldge is up for debate.
It is common belief that financial help is more efficient than sending experts overseas to teach local workforce, but there are some downsides that have to be considered.
In too many cases, funding has landed in the bak account of corrupted politicians or in the best case has been mismanaged and used in a unproper way. It is no surpirse, therefore, that in most countries international financial aid has not worked out, leading to spiking problems further, ensuing in some cases poverty, famine and domestic wars.
Nevertheless financial support remains still the quickest route to follow, when it comes to reliefing war-torn countries. In order to achieve tangible results for the population, foreing countries should scrutinize local politicians and officials, so that the financial resources can go actually to the needy.
On the other hand, others suggest to send experts like teachers, doctors and high-qualified workers to share their precious know-how with the local people. Although this way, seems apparently to be slow, in reality presents some advantages that are worth being said.
First of all, a direct contact with the local people avoids the waste of money caused by high level of corruption. Secondly, teaching local workforce makes possible a truly economic independence, in the light of the fact that those people, once properly taught, will be able to provide services for their country without having to rely on overseas aids.
Those methods have been tested in many countries, specially in Africa, with promising results.
In conclusion, sharing skills and valuable know-how is to me the key to reach economic autonomy and to close the shocking gap between rich and poor nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Especially
... paralleled by other non-monetary gaps. especially in the medical and energetic fields. Se...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 132, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unproper way" with adverb for "unproper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... best case has been mismanaged and used in a unproper way. It is no surpirse, therefore, that in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 135, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...st case has been mismanaged and used in a unproper way. It is no surpirse, theref...
^
Line 6, column 305, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...iking problems further, ensuing in some cases poverty, famine and domestic wars. Ne...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...es poverty, famine and domestic wars. Nevertheless financial support remains still the qui...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 27, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest sending'.
Suggestion: suggest sending
...o the needy. On the other hand, others suggest to send experts like teachers, doctors and high...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, as to, in conclusion, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 462.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37445887446 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79828611204 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.164863267 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.238095238 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61904761905 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151791156156 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391866744793 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394232890519 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580904190482 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445982706725 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 78.4519038076 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.