In the wake of globalization purchasing habits have undergone a massive change over the last decades so that it is not difficult to split buyers into two categories: those who have shifted their attention to international products, and the ones who still rely on local goods. Whether the benefits lay on one side or on the other is still up for debate and this essay will analyze the pros and cons of this trend.
The concept of globalization has been around for many decades. It may sound surprising, but globalization can be traced back to the roman empire, which had ruled the ancient world for almost thousand years. Its military strength was not the only ingredient of its success. Busy roads and intense commercial exchanges made it possible to build a strong economical system every citizen could virtually profit from. As we can see, already in the ancient time, people could buy items coming from the most remote corners of the empire. Technological advancement, the rise of the Internet has certainly changed the way we look at our world, but the demand for valuable goods has remain intact over the centuries.
These days as in the past customers pay attention essentially to two aspects when it comes to buying: price and quality. As long as buyers can get to reliable goods for an affordable price, the origin of a product remains a minor detail. That is probably the reason behind the behavior of several customers who seek for items on international markets. Especially in this time, this can be a wise choice: shipping prices have significantly dropped, pace of production in developing countries is steadily ramping up, so that ordering items from all over the world has become convenient.
On the other side, voices rise in defense of local production that they see endangered by big corporations like Amazon or multinational companies. Although these companies not only operate in the digital world but actually create jobs in the real economy, several stores can not simply compete with those giants and in some cases they sadly vanish from the business scene.
In conclusion, it is quite tricky to draw a line. For example, I personally prefer to turn to local stores when it comes to buying fresh vegetables, fruit, and meat. Products are fresh and cultivated in the local area, which also helps to reduce the carbon footprint of agriculture. However, there are some items that local industries can not produce, like TV Sets, computers, or cars. In this case, turning to international markets, is not a whim but a necessity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... had ruled the ancient world for almost thousand years Its military strength was not the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...nges made it possible to build a strong economical system every citizen could virtually pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...d but the demand for valuable goods has remain intact over the centuries These day...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods has remain intact over the centuries These days as in the past customers pay ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey sadly vanish from the business scene In conclusion it is quite tricky to draw...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vegetables'' or 'vegetable's'?
Suggestion: vegetables'; vegetable's
...al stores when it comes to buying fresh vegetables fruit and meat Products are fresh and c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83953488372 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62854591944 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56511627907 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 430.0 20.2975951904 2118% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2081.0 106.682146367 1951% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 430.0 20.7667163134 2071% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 97.0 7.06120827912 1374% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159521581984 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159521581984 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892999280766 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507167944424 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 216.4 13.0946893788 1653% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -364.97 50.2224549098 -727% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 171.0 11.3001002004 1513% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.27 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 28.97 8.58950901804 337% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 174.0 10.1190380762 1720% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 10.7795591182 269% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.