Rightfully regarded as one of the foremost breakthrough of the latest century, the Internet has made it into our daily life changing the way we work, interact, and enjoy leisure time. What some decades ago seemed to be science fiction, it is reality nowadays. Connecting people living in different continents, listening to music coming from other nations, receiving news from all over the world is not nothing short of a miracle. Without leaving our room we have the potential to explore the whole planet. In the wake of this fact some even believe that traveling is unnecessary. This essay will examine this point of view and comparing the pros and cons of it.
Conversely to our ancestors who had to set off in search of food and better climatic conditions, most of us now travel to far places for pleasure. Since the dawn of mankind, humans thirst for exploration. It is this powerful drive that have pushed humans to climb mountains, to surf the oceans, and to conquest the glaciers, It is no surprise therefore that the flame fueling the desire of discovery is still burning and that new technology helps to keep it alive. Thanks to the Internet it is possible to plan a holiday, to pick the perfect hotel, and to book the cheapest flight in a matter of seconds. Yet, whether the Internet can actually supersede a real travel is still up for debate.
Although the Web offers an incredible aid when it comes to getting information about an unknown country, claiming that traveling has lost its significance is a gross understatement. Visiting a country is like tasting a new dish. Only through our physical senses can we appreciate the landscape, the architecture, the flavor, and the sounds of a foreign country. The Internet has the power to open windows on far-flung nations, but only the real contact can make us understand how they live. Although all the travel around the world might not be enough to bridge cultures distant from each other and to engender deep cross-cultural awareness, it still remains a powerful weapon to narrow the gap among nations.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that the Internet provides a reliable tool to explore cities and countries away from us, but it will never completely substitute the experience of a real journey. To understand how foreign countries life, requires much more commitment than getting a glimpse of them surfing the Internet. Those who foretell that travel is going to disappear, should be aware that this outcome is a long shot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...d comparing the pros and cons of it. Conversely to our ancestors who had to set off in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'real travel'.
Suggestion: real travel
...her the Internet can actually supersede a real travel is still up for debate. Although the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...real journey. To understand how foreign countries life, requires much more commitment tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, if, second, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88470588235 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69999769319 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592941176471 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4327982584 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.263157895 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187308552721 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480380743942 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494255704146 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108516983664 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046763877809 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.