Some people think politicians have a huge influence on the world, others think scientists do. Discuss both views and give your opinion
There is a heated debate about whether politicians or scientists have a more significant impact on the world. From my perspective, both of them make valuable contributions to the public.
First of all, politicians can build a peaceful society and keep citizens safe. To clarify, politicians are rule makers who hold responsibilities to guide residents in such a good way and punish those breaking a rule. For example, under-18-years-old children will not be allowed to consume alcohol in Korea; furthermore, those who sell alcohol to them have to pay a heavy fine, even close their shops. Moreover, maintaining multilateral trade agreements with other countries is one of the duties that politicians carry out , which helps them boost the nation’s economy by increasing exports and imports. This can be seen in the economy of Vietnam, partly depending on the export of rice to foreign countries, which is up to 70% of the total amount of market share. Hence, there is no doubt that the prosperity of the world is decided by how well politicians from different countries cooperate.
Besides politicians, the influence of scientists cannot be neglected. For one thing, in the modern society surrounded by cutting-edge technological devices, it is not hard to recognize that these technologies are invented by scientists such as smartphones, computers and the Internet . Not only modern machines were created but vaccines for deadly diseases, including chickenpox were also discovered and experimented on by scientists. In addition, advanced technologies developed by scientists have been applied in the military, exploring outer space and industry, which cannot be achieved alone by politicians.
To sum up, both politicians and scientists have been struggling for the sake of their country in a variety of ways. Therefore, neither is less influential . Without laws and regulations, scientists could use their inventions for dangerous purposes, resulting in negative consequences, and politicians would be less powerful if there was no support from scientists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is a heated debate about whether politicians or scientists have a...
^^
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er politicians or scientists have a more significant impact on the world. From my...
^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... perspective, both of them make valuable contributions to the public. First o...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...For example, under-18-years-old children will not be allowed to consume alcohol ...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...children will not be allowed to consume alcohol in Korea; furthermore, those who...
^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aintaining multilateral trade agreements with other countries is one of the dutie...
^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of the duties that politicians carry out , which helps them boost the nation’s eco...
^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch helps them boost the nation’s economy by increasing exports and imports. This...
^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oost the nation’s economy by increasing exports and imports. This can be seen in...
^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orts. This can be seen in the economy of Vietnam, partly depending on the export ...
^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Besides politicians, the influence of scientists cannot be neglected. For ...
^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the influence of scientists cannot be neglected. For one thing, in the modern ...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed. For one thing, in the modern society surrounded by cutting-edge technologica...
^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng, in the modern society surrounded by cutting-edge technological devices, it i...
^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... smartphones, computers and the Internet . Not only modern machines were created ...
^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... . Not only modern machines were created but vaccines for deadly diseases, includ...
^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.... Therefore, neither is less influential . Without laws and regulations, scientist...
^^
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f there was no support from scientists.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, first of all, for one thing, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48902821317 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23936863044 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623824451411 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3494142423 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.733333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 5.01903807615 359% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146814574141 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507891220554 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458547990418 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096739266056 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311296963852 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.