Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s advanced society, there is normally claimed that whether children using technology facilities are worse than who have reading skill is a heat debate. This essay agree with suggestion completely due to the fact that acquiring orthodox horizon and praticing the concentration level.
It is evidently reasonable to argue that there is widen the gap of knowledge by approaching the books. If you want to become a genius resident, you have to read more and more books. Athough individuals could gain a lot of good information via telly, they would have a lot of visual problems hence it can be a contributing element influencing daily activities. Myopic is an example, people could not see anything without glassess since they might stick their eyes to the screen all day. Furthmore,it is widely accepted that focusing abilities could be derived to help children become a person who has a moral value.
Books are carefully censored so that the young adults could have better understanding instead of exposing to technology a lot which might harm to their health. For instance, virtually do people play game and watch television, they always be disturbed by poping up of adverisement, hence their information might be broken that they can not pay attention to learn full of knowledge. By contrast, when individuals are reading, they focus to every single words that appear in front of their eyes, this is why they will enhance their concentration field.
From what has been declared above, I am convinced that there are 2 primary reason why the young adults need reading skills rather than playing and watching telly, which are learning a numberous of trusted horizon and staying concentration to follow the flow of content. By having said that the authorities can build up more library and open more the book events
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ng technology facilities are worse than who have reading skill is a heat debate. Th...
^^^
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'widened'.
Suggestion: widened
...ently reasonable to argue that there is widen the gap of knowledge by approaching the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 496, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ir eyes to the screen all day. Furthmore,it is widely accepted that focusing abilit...
^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be always
...le play game and watch television, they always be disturbed by poping up of adverisement,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to full'
Suggestion: to full
...hat they can not pay attention to learn full of knowledge. By contrast, when individ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06622516556 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75099210208 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3497850998 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157741691375 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491555892069 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435402678348 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890886513694 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019779113975 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.