In the era of globalization, exchanging goods or helping other countries has become more and more prevalent. As a result, several people assume that poorer countries should be supported in terms of aid for health and education by more developed countries nations. In my viewpoint, like everything else, this situation also exists two faces. Both sides will be shed a light in the following essay.
On one hand, I agree with this opinion because of two main reasons. First, it cannot be denied that all countries in the world create a big family. When a member of this family is in difficulty, the obvious duty of the others is helping this member. Second, so important is supporting the poorer countries, that it can save many people and allow citizens of these nations to become priceless asset in the future.
On the other hand, there are some hassles with this opinion. First, in a long term, if poor nations are always provided aid for health and education, they may lose movivation to overcome the problem and improve themselves. Unquestionably, it will be too dependent for poor countries to develop. Last but not least, the rich countries may run out of aids for health and education if they support the others too much, which will put them in dilemma.
In a nutshell, helping each other is a good action but it should be controlled and monitored carefully. Every country should make full plus points and eliminate the negative effects of this mix-blessing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.896 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66850070264 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4808794792 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4285714286 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298548121712 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929388775278 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105277971035 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169970293627 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718876332154 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.