Some people think that space exploration is a waste of resources while others think that it is essential for mankind to continue to explore the universe in which we live. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
In the contemporary era, many individuals believe that it is uneccessary to spend national resources on space discoveries while others would advocate that exploring the cosmos is extremely crucial to humans. This essay will discuss both points of view and argue in favour of the latter.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that exploring the universe has caused us an immense amount of time and effort without any clear benefit. The first worth-mentioning fact perhaps is that performing a mission in outer space requires an enormous budget to construct and launch aerospace ships. However, this kind of investment is not always guaranteed with benefits. For example, NASA has conducted numerous failed missions which result in an utmost waste of billions of dollars and years of labour. In addition, many individuals consider that investing in foods and shelters for those in needs could be more worthwhile than exploring space. This is understandable since famine and poverty are threatening the lives of many people in developing countries.
On the other hand, making effort to explore the universe can be tremendously beneficial in the long run. This is primarily because the Earth, which provides human with foods and living habitast, is running out of natural resources due to mass consumption and exploitation. Furthermore, industrialization has caused severe effects on the natural environment by producing toxic chemicals and exhaust fumes. In fact, many scientists have predicted that the Earth may not supply adequate resources for all of us in the next centuries or even become unlivable in the worst scenario. Thus, detecting a new planet which has similar features to the Earth and contains organic creatures may be a solution for mankind.
In conclusion, while some individuals suppose that digging into spaces is a waste of time and effort, I strongly support the idea that cosmos exploration is necessary since it will bring about positive impacts for society as a whole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29245283019 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91189025572 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9005137689 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254068744198 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729950577527 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446202835452 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147496890378 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198123796505 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.