In this modern era, a few sections of society claim that the authority should rigorously publish , while others argue that individuals should be allowed to generate noise as they want. From my point of view, the government should control the noise strictly in order to mitigate hearing-related disorders as well as avoid interfering with human’s daily activities.
To begin with, there are two reasons that people could make as much noise as they wish. First and foremost, generating sound is regarded as a recreational activity, which could assist people to relax after working. According to research conducted by a group of scientists, singing could help people to mitigate their stress at work more efficiently than playing computer games. Furthermore, due to the growth of technology, people now can create a sort of wall that can block the sound, which can prevent people from being disturbed by the din made by other people. However, this invention is not widely applied all over the world.
On the other hand, exerting rackets could lead people to experience two detrimental outcomes. Firstly, this noise unintentionally distracts other people, especially those who are working on their tasks. A case in point is that pupils who are preparing for their examination, if they are influenced by loud noise, they could not concentrate on their work, resulting in obtaining an unexpected low score at school. Additionally, this activity could inflict diseases upon people , particularly hearing problems. According to WHO, people living in a metropolitan area could more easily experience these problems than those who live in the countryside. To explain this, the former usually undergo rackets created by human beings, which affects their hearing abilities.
In conclusion, while noise is considered having several merits to people, within the demerits brought to them, specifically distracting people from working as well as affecting human’s health, I strongly believe that the government should restrict rumpuses made by residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the authority should rigorously publish , while others argue that individuals sho...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rfering with human’s daily activities. To begin with, there are two reasons tha...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot widely applied all over the world. On the other hand, exerting rackets coul...
^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ivity could inflict diseases upon people , particularly hearing problems. Accordin...
^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...icularly hearing problems. According to WHO, people living in a metropolitan area c...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich affects their hearing abilities. In conclusion, while noise is considered...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, sort of, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46226415094 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85755577373 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.038798513 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.071428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308689751638 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100060590087 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785810951052 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184335202601 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658469508027 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.