It is socially believed that tertiary institution should offer students with theoretical and practical skills required in the business world, while others argue that the university should focus on theory, even if it is not important to the prospective employer. Knowledge is power, without sufficient practical and theoretical know how one is doomed, therefore this essay agrees that the university should incorporate both practical and theory to produce well equiped prospective professionals.
Acquiring theoretical skills merely is not sufficient, therefore, possessing both practical and theoretical is of paramount importance. For example, in medical school the university teach students about the anatomy of a human being. It is not enough to learn only from the book, as one will be dealing with a live person, therefore a need to examine the real person is crucial. It also helps not to misdiagnose the patients when they qualify and become doctors.
Furthermore, it is always said, " experience is the best teacher." The possibility of gaining experience is through learning. In an organisation, you can not only talk of theory but they also need practical experience. During interviews potential employers often ask candidates about theoretical knowledge of the nature of the job as well as work experience. For instance, my brother attended an interview with a multinational company and there were five interviwees. He occupied second position in that interview, surprisingly they hired him and he was told plainly that, " we hired you because you have knowledge in both practical and theory compared to your competitor who possess theoretical knowledge only.
In addition, season professional who are well vexed with the business world comes from the best tertiary institution. The candidates who are preffered for the job vacancy are from those colleges which incorporate both knowledge. For example, after completing my course. I got employed at a certain company and the manager told me frankly that he prefers candidates from my training school as we are competent, comparing to others from a certain university who have only theoretical skills.
However, the university is meant to provide students with theoretical knowledge. It is a duty for the company to train their employees their day to day running of the business. The college might not have enough time to tackle both theory and practical as it is time comsuming and it also increase financial burden to the candidate or guardian due to extension of the course.
In my own perspective, tertiary institutions should focus on both skills, inspite of the drawbacks which comes with the course to accomplish it. The main crucial thing for the college should be to produce competent and seasoned professionals who are well equiped with both knowledge and skills as well as being useful to the industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t sufficient, therefore, possessing both practical and theoretical is of paramoun...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...st tertiary institution. The candidates who are preffered for the job vacancy are from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...cal as it is time comsuming and it also increase financial burden to the candidate or gu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge and skills as well as being useful to the industry.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, frankly, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 457.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35448577681 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99374894388 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496717724289 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0758686995 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.35 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.85 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204042290403 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607362784002 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542014779623 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113891206842 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629787658626 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.