Some people think that we can use animals in any way for the benefits of human beings. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion
These days, whether animals should be used in any way to serve human's requirements or not remains a controversial topic. While it can be argued that animal usage is morally wrong, I believe that in some certain cases, people have no choice except for implementing actions on animals.
On the one hand, there are ethical arguments against using animals for the merits of humans. In fact, today a vast number of animals are being pushed to the verge of extinction due to human activities. For example, many hunters try to poach animals due to the increase in demand for products made from body parts of them such as rhino's horns. It is true that people have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and the lives of every creature on this planet should be respected. Therefore, the benefits of people cannot justify the animal suffering caused.
On the other hand, it seems to me that in some cases, animal suffering is the inevitable part of life. In particular, animal research in the laboratories is essential to measure the effectiveness of new medicines or medical treatments. Consequently, a certain amount of suffering on mice or rats can be justified if human's lives are saved. It would be wrong if governments prohibited animal research until equally effective alternative methods have been invented. However, I agree with the banning of using animals for non-medical products.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to allow animal testing for medical purposes to save human's lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | qqwqe | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | trinhthanh | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | trinhthanh | 67 | view |
- International tourism has become a huge industry in the world. Are the problems that international travelers cause greater than the advantages they bring? 11
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays more and more people are using social networking sites and apps such as Facebook Twitter What are the reasons of this trend What are the impacts that social networks bring to people who use it 70
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, therefore, while, except for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, kind of, such as, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95817490494 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72129147406 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589353612167 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1382891024 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.307692308 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4615384615 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276389954496 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098965761247 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457258339225 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175526289243 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245502723758 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.