Some people think that we can use animals in any way for the benefits of human beings. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Some people think that we can use animals in any way for the benefits of human beings. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion
These days, whether animals should be used in any way to serve human's requirements remains a controversial topic. While it can be argued that animal usage is morally wrong, I believe that in some certain cases, people have no choice except for implementing actions on animals.
On the one hand, there are ethical arguments against using animals for the merits of humans. In fact, today a vast number of animals are being pushed to the verge of extinction due to human activities. For example, many people try to poach animals due to the increase in demand for products made from animals body. Opponents of such animal suffering argue that people have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and the lives of every creature on this planet should be respected. Therefore, the benefits of people cannot justify the animal suffering caused.
On the other hand, it seems to me that other measures are not always available and animal suffering is the inevitable part of life. It is necessary that animals are experimented in laboratory rooms by scientists to test the effectiveness of medicines or medical treatments. In particular, a certain amount of suffering on mice or rats can be justified if human's lives are saved. It would be wrong if governments prohibited animal research until equally effective alternative methods are invented. However, I agree with the banning of using animals for non-medical products.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to allow animal research for medical purposes to save human's lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, while, except for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00344827586 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66964483915 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562068965517 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1514276788 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47338446331 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163210217227 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157385854193 0.0667982634062 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34499495367 0.151304729494 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.328329806741 0.056905535591 577% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.