In recent decades, the debate on whether females should serve the military has never been completely settled, causing some public controversy. Although some feminists regard this idea as plausible, there are certain drawbacks associated with this situation.
One of the most compelling reasons is that women are not particularly suitable for the military environment. First, certain duties can be emotionally overwhelming, which renders women susceptible to several mental illnesses, including depression. In fact, since female soldiers are more sensitive than their male counterparts, they will be the most likely to suffer when dealing with unbearable loss. Second, these women could be subject to sexual harassment or sexism, as men tend to be dominant in the armed forces. For instance, higher rank officers could exert their power over female subordinates and force them to fulfill their demands, which leads to many unintended consequences.
Besides, the existence of servicewomen can be counterproductive. First, due to their physical limitations, these women are not able to handle heavy duties. In fact, since most tasks in the army are physically demanding, their lack of great resilience and strength could affect the morale of the team. Not only that, young female soldiers with good appearance could distract other males within their team. This suggests that the male soldiers will take steps to get these girls falling in love with them, which undermines army regulations.
In conclusion, although the idea of women serving the army initially seems reasonable, it can be fraught with pitfalls. By allowing fewer women to join the armed forces, the military strength will be greatly benefited.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53231939163 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84025582644 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631178707224 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7352858635 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.928571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0831260544606 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308244104503 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300304385327 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568395259872 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278253327323 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.