Whether a career should be chosen freely or based on reality by young people has evolved as a controversial topic. Despite the arguments refuting the substantial role of free choices, I am more convinced that youngsters should be oriented according to reality.
On the one hand, those who place a great emphasis on selecting a freewill job point to the need for nurturing peoples' innate aptitude, leading to fostering creativity. this may mean that the more interested, the more innovation and creativity young people are able to show in their vocation. In this sense, they are bound to devote entirely themselves to make their best. Take Bill Gates as an example who dropped out of the college to finesse in programming skill and reached his dream about a personal computer on every desk in every home. Therefore, this, in itself, motivates young people to give it their best shot which helps the breakthrough in their profession.
However, pursuing dreams is not the only logical reason when a job is concerned. The young should catch a sight of the future of their society and lay the foundation for the job to meet the society requirements. Simply put, this is highly likely provides the young with a secure job prospect whereby obviating an array of civic demands. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by a society demanding doctors in order to health betterment. This is where there will be always a place for new graduates in medicine field. Added to this, if young people are realistic about their job selection, it is more likely that, they will be able to admit failure in their route due to being goal-oriented. This, in turn, can play a prominent part in diminishing a sense of anxiety and stress-related vocation.
To conclude, while acknowledging the key role of freewill career in flourishing innate abilities, I would embrace that young people should prove adaptability toward their society requirements to secure their job opportunities as well as improve their community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...itude, leading to fostering creativity. this may mean that the more interested, the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02994011976 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85474292592 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5962961459 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341044564347 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106014064587 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886284888443 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209629341785 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177969835356 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.