Some people think younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government. Some think it would be a good idea for younger people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It remains a controversy that whether important positions in government should be given to junior workers or not. In this essay, I will discuss the viewpoints of both supporters and opponents, and give my own opinion.
Apparently, there are some obvious reasons why such positions are beyond the ability of youngsters. To begin with, young people are characterized as immature and inexperienced nature so that they tend to make decisions without enough consideration. As a consequence, if they are in charge of important departments in the government, their imprudent actions might give rise to serious results and high prices which they have to pay. Therefore, if the government concerns about the welfare of residents and require serious commitment, youngsters seem to be unsuitable for those positions. Besides, senior workers are likely not to accept the leadership of a younger one. As a result, conflicts in offices might affect negatively on working productivity and efficiency.
On the contrary, some people argue that younger people should be given more opportunities to do government tasks. For one thing, the young generation has more enthusiasm and energy than the older one. This is to say, youngsters are more likely to devote themself and put more effort into their performance. For another, the young generation is receptive to new notions with up-to-date thinking. They are expected to bring new innovative style into the operation of government, which is usually considered to be rigid and conservative. For example, young officials are taking advantage of online social networks to communicate with residents, therefore enhancing mutual understandings as well as the ties of the government and the public.
To sum up, I believe the young should be encouraged to take more responsibilities for positions in the government. Although they might make some mistakes, it is a chance for them to grow and be competent for this job in the years to come.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...te thinking. They are expected to bring new innovative style into the operation of government,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as a result, as well as, for one thing, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27388535032 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0861433706 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570063694268 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7451385388 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287518258592 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835135450567 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707338284919 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171920387852 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173761498925 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.