Some people thinks it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people thinks it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

People have different views about the type of friends, while some think that people who have the same views should be friends I side with those who believe that it is better to have a friend who has different ambitions and views.
On the one hand, people choose likeminded friends who share their interests due to various reasons. First of all, it is easy to communicate with someone who interested in the same stuff, therefore, this kind of friendship long-lasting. For instance, those partners who work at the same workplace in addition, have the same hobby like collecting stamps or playing computer games will remain as a friends forever because they share each other`s interests. If individuals do not have the same point of view, they will not be friends, since, firstly, it is difficult to be friends with someone who does not have the same ideology, and secondly, it is not interesting.
On the flip side, we can no deny the fact that some people prefer to be friends with people who have different views and interests because it is challenging and seem extraordinary them. Thus, being in a relationship or being friends with someone who has different views, will increase one`s chances of learning something new. In other words, tight friendship allows people to communicate with other frequently, as a result, when people with different views talk about their interests another person unknowingly becoming interested on it. For example, when two milliners Bill Gates and Warren Buffett met, Bill Gates was a philanthropist and had a charity organization, soon Buffett also started donating money to charity because Bill talked a lot about it. If they were not friends Buffett would not have become involved in charity work.
In conclusion, despite the fact that people enjoy being friends with someone who shares their opinion, I believe that a person will learn new things if he tries to be friends with a person who has different views.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 762, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ity because Bill talked a lot about it. If they were not friends Buffett would not...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00611620795 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67271289421 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501529051988 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7181484137 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.818181818 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7272727273 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0909090909 7.06120827912 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410668923793 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175310179814 0.084324248473 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114512687364 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295915509662 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869599826691 0.056905535591 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.