Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Nowadays, there are two different ideas related to one’s job. Some people prefer changing their company many times while others suggest always remaining in the same workplace. Although both have benefits, I would agree with the former opinion because it is more suitable with contemporary standards.
Workers loyal to just one company throughout their career often have the opportunity to reach top positions the longer they work there as promotions. However, this is only a possibility that interests a restricted group of employees inside the company; whereas, others just grow older getting more and more specialized only on that particular activity which may be a disadvantage in case of bankruptcy of the organization. In fact, when they will apply for a new job, offers may be limited only to the department they have always been working in.
On the other hand, people who change their job many times can posses a wider set of skills in different areas. Consequently, employees with more abilities may achieve better results and also reach leadership positions in a shorter time. In addition, employers usually look for people with a broad outlook, making them able to analyze and solve problems from different perspectives. That’s why during interviews and practical tests people who have changed jobs while in many organizations are preferred by the examiners.
In conclusion, I also think is doubtless that a deep knowledge and experience can bring benefits not only to companies but also to individuals. Finally, relationships built with colleagues met halfway, can have a positive influence on their lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, look, may, so, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36821705426 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88810671323 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9369405574 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.416666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196298985324 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641781975788 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502275303558 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100150141988 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371486048297 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.