Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
As more and more occupations are establishing with unprecedented pace, some wonder if working in the same company for a whole life span will be more beneficial than working for various organizations. While there are advantages from both sides of the argument, I believe in the former statement that ones should dedicate their energy to a singular cooperation.
On the first hand, it is clear that by concentrating on one objective at a time, workers could ripe significant gains. One of those profit would be the increment in chances of promotion thanks to their devotion. That is because higher-ups always delve for loyal employees who would bring more value in the long-term. Another advantage would be the stability income. With modern welfare systems utilized by many cooperation, there would be a tendency that the loyalty would remain their jobs and salary longer in comparison with those who change departments rapidly. Furthermore, employed for a noticeable period of time would enable people to have an insight about a organization culture thus would serve as a pro allowing them to enhance their career dramatically.
On the other hand, modifying one’s occupation depending on particular situations provides many positive profits as well. Firstly, a change in a working condition means that there would be a refresh which advances people’s attitude towards their works. Moving from an engineering department to a sale role, for instance, helps people become curious about the new work flow; therefore, they would be more energetic and finish deadlines punctually. Secondly, meeting with employers and workers from a variety of companies serve as an important role to expand one’s horizon. Consequently, their experiences would be more diversify, making these employees more valuable for headhunters. In other words, more chances would be presented for them to flourish in the new place.
To conclude, while I advocate for a long-term, dedicated occupation in a particular firm than jobs in multiple organizations during one’s working span, it should depend on one’s needs to choose his or her career plan which provides the best benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cooperation seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much cooperation', 'a good deal of cooperation'.
Suggestion: much cooperation; a good deal of cooperation
...With modern welfare systems utilized by many cooperation, there would be a tendency that the loy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... Furthermore, employed for a noticeable period of time would enable people to have an insight ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... enable people to have an insight about a organization culture thus would serve a...
^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ing condition means that there would be a refresh which advances people’s attitude toward...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.357771261 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91246493392 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592375366569 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8175518664 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185716476255 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641285192172 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604320554351 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130117878739 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644564658336 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.