Nowadays, it is irrefutable that majority of high posts in authorities are occupied by senior citizens which has resulted in discrimination towards youngsters. It has ignited the debate that whether young people are fit for such jobs or not. This essay tends to delve into both viewpoints in subsequent fragments.
To begin with, higher posts come with higher responsiblities and risks associated with it. There are some factors that symbolize that youngsters are not suitable for decision making jobs. First and foremost is lack of experience and knowledge as it is well known that experience develop with age. Youngsters heve insufficient information about distinct aspects of such jobs. Secondly, it is clear that majority of young people are aggressive in nature. They have tendency to loose temper easily and in stressful situations their false steps and unwise decisions may lead to the worst consequences.
However, some individuals opine that youngsters must be given a chance to prove themselves productive for nation because of their plethora of abilities. Firstly, young people are well educated and multitalented. They can bring their country to a bright future by their creative ideas. Their multiskillls can proven very useful to nation. Secondly, they are more enthusiastic and dedicated to their work and have a fixed goal in their lives. They are more energetic and efficient, thus have a ability to do work effectively. Moreover, youngsters are corruption free, hence handle responsibilities without personal benefit.
In my view, although youngsters are aggressive and unexperienced, but their qualifications and abilities must not be given Nelson's eye.
To recapitulate, young people are well qualified, more enthusiastic and innovative, so they ought to be given an opportunity to show themselves good at deciolsion making occupations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...essive in nature. They have tendency to loose temper easily and in stressful situatio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'prove' or 'be proven'?
Suggestion: prove; be proven
... creative ideas. Their multiskillls can proven very useful to nation. Secondly, they a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...more energetic and efficient, thus have a ability to do work effectively. Moreove...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54195804196 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12074836701 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2329994192 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139995418042 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455184058822 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062330400306 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720348442361 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026814943125 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.