Some scientist think that there are intelligent life forms on the other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientist think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Humans are ment to explore and for that technology is being providing the ways to investigate the other planetsas well. Many scientist believes that on other planets there are aspects of lives and we should contact them. While, other opines that it would harmful. In this essay i would throw the light on both the above concerned issue before coming to the reasoned conclusion.
Before embarking on the issue should understand that why it has becoming the matter of the heated debate. Firstly , in the mid - ninetieth century the scientist started the exploration of the celestial structure of space due to the invention of space flights and unmanned robotics humans. The astronomy invented satellite shatters to capture the moments of planets to reveal it to humans as well as to the whole word. Through these probe, scientist thinks that it would be a successful task, a positive decision of humankind and also it would provide new predate inventions. A prime example, the report of one such researcher published that in twentieth century the aliens signs has been seen on mars. Consequently , the contacting idea become in the scientists theories.
On the flipside, many scientists advocate that emphasis on conversation with so called unmanned robotics would be harmful. There are ample of negative consequences , the foremost majir chunk - aliens will get the ways of reaching on our planet. They would try to start conflicts. For instance , in a report the scientists has accepted this bitter truth that aliens are alive and human biengs must maintain the distance because they can use their powers to spoil and threat earth. Therefore , the conversation might be the way of welcoming the danger towards human being.
In my opinion, exploring the space would be an interesting phenomenon but, giving signal to the unmanned robotics would be harmful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many scientists'.
Suggestion: Many scientists
...o investigate the other planetsas well. Many scientist believes that on other planets there ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts of lives and we should contact them. While, other opines that it would harmful. In...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...es that it would harmful. In this essay i would throw the light on both the above...
^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the matter of the heated debate. Firstly , in the mid - ninetieth century the scie...
^^
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...igns has been seen on mars. Consequently , the contacting idea become in the scien...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...There are ample of negative consequences , the foremost majir chunk - aliens will ...
^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k - aliens will get the ways of reaching on our planet. They would try to start c...
^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uld try to start conflicts. For instance , in a report the scientists has accepted...
^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ers to spoil and threat earth. Therefore , the conversation might be the way of we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15231788079 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68460597999 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586092715232 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4712678613 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296132832459 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906855332936 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731843898062 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181223370179 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535329389997 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.