Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and message should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous.
Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Indeed, mankind has been always enthusiastic to contact other creatures to expands its relationship with enigma species. While some people think we should find aliens who live on so far planets and even galaxies, others like me have stuck to this idea of whether it is a right approach to investigate into what is not our concerns. In this essay I intend to discuss about both views as follows.
Surprisingly, some astronaut agencies like the NASA have started few projects to appraises the possibility of living humans or animals in space. In other words, they are constantly sending special signal into space to inform aliens we exist and would like to contact you. Often the proponents of this issue argue that if our planet "Earth" is exposing to be destroyed by various factors like natural disasters or meteorites, thus other our partners are able to save us. Moreover, maybe in the future we can exchange different goods to form a constructive collaboration, who's know? Perhaps they have a complicated brains and intelligence than current humans.
In contrast, critics assume that when we have no adequate awareness of other creatures is it really reasonable to contact other unknown humans? Definitely not. The opponents believe that these aliens are fully unreliable and always there is a potential risk they consider us as their enemies. However, they may be completely peaceful ones and also have more advanced equipment and infrastructure but it is intricate matter for us.
To sum it up, in my opinion we shall not endanger the our people who live on the earth as the governments and other scientists should have a reconsideration sending message to these meta-cognitive creatures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...s to form a constructive collaboration, whos know? Perhaps they have a complicated b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...up, in my opinion we shall not endanger the our people who live on the earth as the gov...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sage to these meta-cognitive creatures.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, thus, while, in contrast, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14336917563 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95315271915 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655913978495 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4401431046 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226298552529 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646176274069 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466672183005 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129879557513 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376118793707 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.