Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent years, the governments have truly invested a huge amount of money to expand the different communicative ways including railways and roads. When some people like me believe that a considerable of budget in transportation should allocate to trains, others assume it is not a right approach. In this essay, I intend to present some reasons for my position as follows.
In one hand, it seems that more passengers can effortlessly travel by trains rather than cars especially in the peak hours it really would be annoying to stick into traffic jam. One particularly salient example is some overcrowded cities like New York and Bangkok that individuals have to bear a high volume of noises in the traffic. Affordability is the slightly contributing factor as people can find the railway transportation price is remarkably cheaper than other forms.
On the other hand, it is an irrefutable fact that environmental problems have turned into one of the contentious issues. In other words considerable amount of air pollution and global warming associated with the vehicles which emitted annually thousands tones carbon dioxide into atmosphere. Admittedly, the train has the little contribution in this matter in comparing with the same diesel vehicles.
Overall, there are a wide range of opinions in term of transportation expansions but I reaffirm my view that the benefits of spending money on railways are far much than roads and has the less detrimental side effects for nature, so-called environment-friendly.
Comments
I am new user here. me
I am new user here. me palwisha ilyas and i am preparing me IELTS general exam and I want to evaluate my Essay writing from this site as like other's . any one please guid me is we have to pay something or just paste my Essay here for this purpose?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34297520661 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16496556617 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661157024793 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7422720885 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.3 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161740026691 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543656200104 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420611887576 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874510278313 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285981676417 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.