Some think scientists should be allowed to send messages into space to communicate with
other life forms while others believe this is too dangerous.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Many are of belief that seeking out other planets and sending messages to find if there are other forms
of life would be too dangerous and have irreparable consequences. In my opinion, it desired to condone
probably dangers and seek out.
Not only have been Looking for alien one of the major goals of scientists but moviemakers and writers
also considered this subject. Finding an alien would significantly be effective for humans in the case which
that they can share insights and develop our horizon by answering some long-lasted questions. Scientists
are also venturing with aim of discovering other forms of life and getting a bit closer to the fact of origin
and likelihood of colonization on another planet.
At least, finding aliens will tackle down both our curiosity and old dream in this subject but, the disastrous
downside will come up if our failure in negotiation with aliens if there were any aliens. Aside from the
aforementioned optimistic possibilities, in the worst-case scenario, they could turn against humans and
threaten the human race in the distant future. We have seen many movies in the relevant genres that
aliens wiped up humans on the planet at the end. Despite these all pessimistic and optimistic possibilities
about whether aliens exist, the government must aside a significant fund for aerospace to develop and
promote their technology. In addition, I contend that finding aliens or another planet to colonization is
not far-fetch for humans according to their pace of progress that has been happening.
In conclusion, there is plenty of pons and cons but by considering the probability and the proportion of
benefits to danger, it’s sensible to condone the danger inherited and take the chance to satisfy the desire.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 25, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pons seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of (pons)'.
Suggestion: plenty of (pons)
...een happening. In conclusion, there is plenty of pons and cons but by considering the probabi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, at least, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22299651568 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84737430946 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.2406763818 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.272727273 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.38176352705 411% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161658951493 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06275908252 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820618950024 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467395664021 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063121327685 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.