In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Technology is flourishing by leaps and bounds in every aspects; same is case for the research in agriculture field. Several people around the globe are still starving despite the progress in agricultural science. This essay will describe a few reasons for this disparity and how to overcome this problem.
There is no doubt that technology and research are growing day-by-day. However, is it expanding all over the world? The answer is no; technological advancement is concentrated among the prosperous nations. Thus, the developing countries are still cultivating their foods in old fashion. For example, the harvesting of rice is still done using animals like bulls, and buffaloes, which is extremely time consuming and people are not able to harvest required amount of rice in the given time frame, while in western countries cultivation is done using machines. Secondly, while the population is increasing at a drastic rate, the necessary foods are not grown at the same pace. For instance, in China, whereas the population has increased at 100% rate in last two decades, the food source and paddy field has increased only by 45%. Hence, the supply of food is not enough as per the demand, and leaving people in hunger.
The first and foremost action to tackle this issue is the knowledge spread all across the world. The technology and research finding must be shared by every nations, so that every countries can utilize the advancement in agriculture to cope up with supply and demand foods. Secondly, every family must be aware to have small family so as to minimize the population burst. The smaller the population size of a nation, the larger is food share; hence lower is the starving problem.
To recapitulate, the centralization of advance knowledge and abrupt population growth are the two key reasons of hunger across the counties. These the issue can be eradicated by sharing technological knowledge and making people aware of merits of small family. These is a famous saying, "sharing is caring, and small family is happy family".
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... the given time frame, while in western countries cultivation is done using machines. Sec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 333, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...mily must be aware to have small family so as to minimize the population burst. The smal...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... starving problem. To recapitulate, the centralization of advance knowledge ...
^^
Line 13, column 263, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
...people aware of merits of small family. These is a famous saying, 'sharing is ca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16023738872 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80195382552 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537091988131 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.386815876 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6111111111 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186535528188 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525282757117 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509223324365 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115062753329 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574179194687 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.