In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Owing to fascinating development in the field of agriculture, it is indeed true that nowadays advancement of the technology is in the entire sector. However, around the world there are many people who still hungry. I discuss the point of why people are still hungry and also give some solution regarding to it.
There are many factors behind it. Firstly, people who have a financial issues, they do not provide enough food and they become a hungry. For instance, in a family have a six member to live. Although, in these families have a one person who is earner. However, some circumstances are created so that, earner and their family could not fulfill their requirements including to eating’s items. Secondly, as we know that unemployment is increasing due to negligence of the work and as well as lack of knowledge. Thirdly, the main reason is, globalization of pollution, whether changes, storm etc. this types of disastrous situations are created that’s why its harm for a cultivation and as well as people.
In spite of hungry people, I have solution for them. There are many aspects regarding on the solution. First and the most things is that government should support to peoples who are suffering from financial issues. Secondly, there are many NGO who run by the biggest businessmen and as well as government so that people who do not have an enough food they simply go and take a meal without any payment. Last but not the least; farmer has to buying advance technology with the help of government. For example, government should help to farmer for giving subsidy with low interest, so that farming output comes faster with the help of advance technology consequently people do not stay in hungry.
I put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that government should be focus and help those people who do not have enough money for eat and as well as who lost their job. It is not only responsibility of government but also responsibility of those people who have financially fit. It is work of humanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o give some solution regarding to it. There are many factors behind it. Firstl...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...t. Firstly, people who have a financial issues, they do not provide enough food and th...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...not provide enough food and they become a hungry. For instance, in a family have a six m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in a family have a six member to live. Although, in these families have a one person wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r a cultivation and as well as people. In spite of hungry people, I have soluti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...equently people do not stay in hungry. I put in a nutshell, I pen down saying t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en down saying that government should be focus and help those people who do not h...
^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'focused', 'focussed'?
Suggestion: focused; focussed
... down saying that government should be focus and help those people who do not have e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, well, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80979827089 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76091520908 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510086455331 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2995600394 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.45 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151529566589 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04917425769 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567804807121 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104197530362 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673662066909 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.