In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
The majority of people in different parts of the globe still have to deal with hunger despite the significant advancement being made in the field of agriculture. Although there are specific root causes behind this phenomenon, effective policies can be adopted to remedy the situation.
There are two causative factors which account for the prevalence of hunger. Firstly, the loss of crops would be the main inducement of such a crisis. That is, regardless of cutting-edge technologies employed in modern horticulture, extreme climate in some areas would ruin the harvests. For instance, almost every year too much precipitation in the north of Iran lead la to flood which causes physical damage to crop plants in the paddy fields. Secondly, the world population is growing on an unprecedented space which means keeping pace with the growing demand for food is more difficult than ever. In other words, even though there have been noticeable improvements in crop cultivation and harvesting, demand continues to outweigh supply.
There are, however, some workable solution to overcome the trends mentioned above. One step would be production of genetically modified food crops which can be resistant to harsh conditions. Another viable alternative is for government to control the growth of population by encouraging mothers to limit their childbearing. This can be done by making contraceptives, such as birth control pills, publicly available for free.
In conclusion, people throughout the world are still afflicted by hunger because of fast-growing population as well as natural disasters. Despite all the contributing factors, proper population-growth measures implemented by the government, coupled with the use of genetic engineering methods for producing resistant plans can reduce the severity of this issue considerably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an be adopted to remedy the situation. There are two causative factors which ac...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61290322581 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11136711696 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648745519713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0480678906 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166478223015 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531129242357 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583855009538 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114101815161 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645075439051 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.