Nowadays, there are different technologies and new approaches which can help to develop agriculture, but there are many people in the world who have not enough food to be alive.
Today, many countries have some rules to control the population. They try to aware citizens about population problems while there are still many countries which have a huge population and it is increasing day to day. With the improvement of the level of health and curing of many illnesses, the rate of death is decreasing. Furthermore, many societies with few populations do not have enough food too, because they have not any lands which are suitable for agriculture. Also, climate changes affect agricultural lands. For example, some acid rainings destroy agricultural lands. Additionally, some countries have rich lands but they have not good equipment and technologies to harvest.
In my opinion, this is a duty of governments that control the country population. They can teach people and help them to be aware of the population problems. Further, There are many NGOs in the whole of the world that they like to help poor countries. So, these NGOs can teach new technologies about agriculture to poor countries. However, climate changes can have many effects on agriculture but farmers can build some artificial spaces to grow up their products. For instance, they can build some buildings and provide artificial conditions such as temperature, water, and light and grow up their products in these buildings.
To sum up, with new problems such as climate changes and global warming every country may confront famine. The best approach is that we find a solution as soon as possible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81305803277 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520146520147 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6255562258 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159689085378 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053122411045 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046380027329 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101836083396 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576497858067 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.