In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Nowadays, there are different technologies and new approaches which can help to develop agriculture, but there are many people in the world who have not enough food to be alive.
Today, many countries have some rules to control population. They try to aware citizens about population problems while there are still many countries which have huge population and it is increasing day to day. With improvement of level of health and curing of many illnesses, rate of death is decreasing. Furthermore, many societies with few population do not have enough food too, because they have not any lands which are suitable to agriculture. Also, climate changes affect to agricultural lands. For example, some acid rainings destroy agricultural lands. Additionally, some countries have rich lands but they have not good equipments and technologies to harvest.
In my opinion, this is a dute of governments that control the country population. They can teach people and help them to be aware about the population problems. Further, There are many NGOs in whole of the world that they like to help poor countries. So, these NGOs can teach new technologies about agriculture to poor countries. However, climate changes can have many effects on agriculture but farmers can build some artificant spaces to grow up their products. For instance, they can build some buildings and provide artifical conditions such as temperature, water and light and grow up their products in these buildings.
To sum up, with new problems such as climate changes and global warming every country may will confornt to famin. The best approach is that we find a solution as soon as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun population seems to be countable; consider using: 'few populations'.
Suggestion: few populations
...asing. Furthermore, many societies with few population do not have enough food too, because th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8040755172 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52962962963 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2372834253 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1875 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165999251409 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553146077116 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498133716553 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104705375613 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598801113647 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.