The charts below give information on the ages of the people of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts show some information about the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and prediction for 2050.
In the first, we can see, in 2000 the half of the population of Yemen was for ages between 0-14, it was the highest proportion. Although, it will decrease to almost one third in 2050. Less than half of the population in 2000 was for adult people (15-59 years) while it will increase smoothly to 57.3% in 2050. The population of elderly people was almost four percent in 2000 and it will rise just to six percent in 2050.
In the second, in 2000 the highest proportion was for people with ages 15-59 years, it was about two-thirds of the population while it will increase to less than half in 2050. Otherwise, the population of elderly ages was less than the one-fourth in 2000 whether it will grow up to more than 42 % in 2050. The proportion of ages between 0-14 years will remain almost the same. It will diminish from 14.3% in 2000 to 11.5% in 2050.
To sum up, we can understand, most of the population of Yemen in 2050 will be adult people with ages between 15 and 59 years while in Italy it will be for adult people and elderly people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en 0-14, it was the highest proportion. Although, it will decrease to almost one third i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, third, while, as for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39631336406 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29830705123 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.373271889401 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.264303993 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211232880165 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112026624237 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796808575163 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184227719518 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864490728721 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.42 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.