The charts below give information on the ages of the people of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagrams show statistic information regarding the ages of the inhabitants of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and also an estimate for 200 we can see that in 2000.

The majority of people in Yemen was between 0 and 14 years da, with 50.1 %, whereas n Italy most of the population was between b- 99 gears old ( 61.6 %), n the same year. On the other rand, yet 56 % of people n the former country was 0 years old or more in 2000. while in the latter contry this figure is represented with 24.1 %.

The projections for 2050 shaw that the number of people with1-39 years and 60 tears more will release in Yemen, reaching 57.5 % and 5.7 % respectively. In contrast, in Italy the population with 15-59 years wd decrease to 46.2 %, were people with 40 years or more will grow to 42.5 %.

Overall, it is possible to see that there is an upward trend in the rates of people with 60 years or more in both countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e population was between b- 99 gears old 61.6 %, n the same year. On the other ra...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ountry was 0 years old or more in 2000. while in the latter contry this figure is rep...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ountry was 0 years old or more in 2000. while in the latter contry this figure is rep...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...with 15-59 years wd decrease to 46.2 %, were people with 40 years or more will grow ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38323353293 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36850077441 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3511280746 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169995606399 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803772402149 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710466347601 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109302650647 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732604429931 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.