The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives some information about one country's export earning in different types from 2015 to 2016. The table gives also some information about the percentage change in each type in 2016 instead of 2015.
Firstly, we can see, the most export values in 2016 and 2015 are for petroleum products and engineered goods. Value of export for petroleum in 2015 was about 60 billion dollars and it was for engineered goods at that time more than 55 billion dollars. They grew up to 3% and 8.5% respectively in 2016.
Following, The country earning of exports in gem and jewelry decreased by 5.18%. The value diminishes from 43 billion dollars in 2015 to 40 billion dollars in 2016. Furthermore, the value of export agricultural products increased by just 0.18% in one year. it remained almost the same between 2015 and 2016 (about 32 billion dollars).
Finally, the most profitable export category is textiles. Its value reached from about 25 billion dollars in 2015 to more than 30 billion dollars in 2016 with 15.24% changes. However, this category had the least value of export in 2015, although, in 2016 it reached to more than 30 billion dollars equals to value of exports of agricultural products at the same time.
To sum up, according to the chart and the table, values of all of the product categories instead of gem and jewelry changed increasingly. conversely, the value of gem and jewelry decreased from 2015 to 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ts increased by just 0.18% in one year. it remained almost the same between 2015 a...
^^
Line 9, column 60, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...g to the chart and the table, values of all of the product categories instead of gem and j...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversely
...f gem and jewelry changed increasingly. conversely, the value of gem and jewelry decreased...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, as for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88524590164 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5671838032 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459016393443 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.527317147 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1428571429 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329976989532 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137309775181 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603090622866 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204581682766 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050824102733 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.