In spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this case? What can be done about it?
It is true that agricultural skills have been advanced significantly. However, a lot of individuals today are still suffering from hunger. In this essay, I will analyze the reasons, and propose some solutions.
Obviously, there are various factors causing the starving people around the globe. First of all, some countries, especially developing countries, invest few funds on agricultural science. Instead, they provide sufficient financial supports to some industries that can generate profits in a short time, such as mining industry. Thus, the local farmers cannot receive the latest crops knowledge and tools, which may cause food price rise. As a result, those who come from impoverished family cannot afford the expensive food. Another cause always raised is that the natural catastrophe can bring about food shortage. Based on a report from University of Auckland, many countries have been threatened by rising sea level. If these countries are flooded, the farmlands will be damaged. If this were the case, then plenty of people would have to face food undersupply.
Fortunately, there are some actions can be taken to increase food supply. To start with, some international organizations, such as APEC and Red Cross, should not only provide free food, but also offer agricultural knowledge. It is the knowledge that always be viewed as the most effective strategy to improve food supply. In addition, local governments should introduce new laws to solve hunger. For example, the farming tax or food tax should be exempted, which is believed as a shortcut to decrease food price.
To conclude, even though agricultural technology has progressed in many areas, there are still numerous individuals facing the starvation issue. Hence, governments should take steps to relieve hunger.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46071428571 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81598933208 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2877353149 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4736842105 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7368421053 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130086019026 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389664802475 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343445618088 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073464923095 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254427667148 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.