In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
At present, there is an increasing number of people live alone around the globe. In my opinion, this phenomenon has both advantageous and disadvantageous development.
It is true that one-person family mode has plenty of merits for both individuals and growth of economy. From individual level, those who live alone will have better self-reliance ability than those who live with family members. As they have more opportunities to deal with a lot of house works, such as cooking, laundry and cleaning. Such life skills will be very useful for ones’ future development. In terms of economic progress, this living form will lead to a rise in demand for housing. As a result, a lot of industries related to construction, such as furniture market, maintenance service and real estate agents, will be benefited from this trend.
On the other hand, the individual and economic arguments given above will have some detrimental effects in one country. First of all, people who live alone will feel loneliness, worry and social isolation rather than experience positive feeling of independence. Because they are more likely to lack daily conversation and emotional support that family members or flat mates can provide. From financial viewpoint, this phenomenon will bring about property price and rent increase. Although it may benefit some businesses, like Airbnb and land development market, general population have to face the rising living cost. Finally, people have to relocate to cheaper towns, also the local population and economy will decline.
To conclude, I would like to embrace the idea that individuals who live alone will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on people and economy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, so, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33703703704 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83619801925 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1673248325 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176942885911 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594296651897 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445241541138 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117146838472 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274609464051 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.