Sports which depend on violence for entertainment, such as wrestling or boxing, have no place in a civilized society and should be banned.
To what extend do you support or reject this idea.
Concerns have been raised over certain sports’ contingency on violence for recreational purposes due to its irrelevance in today’s civilization, notably a consensus of opinion suggesting prohibition of such activities. From my standpoint, I find myself among those opposed to this notion.
In my opinion, perilous sports like boxing and wrestling still maintain a standing in this day and age, mainly because of their positive impacts on viewers and players alike. Because wrestling and boxing require a high degree of physical fitness and training, watching them inspires young people to take care of their bodies. This is especially paramount in a civilized society of white-collar workers preoccupied by office work and trapped in a frenetic, sedentary lifestyle. Such an effect is further accentuated by national morale when supporting one's own country’s participation in international matches. In addition, profound benefits are begotten for the participants themselves through rigorous training for these kinds of sports. Wrestling and boxing players have to abide by strict regulations both in training and battle, learning the lessons of discipline. They also acquire self-defense skills, knowing what to do when physically assaulted. By and large, those sports’ status in today’s society is irrefutable.
Critics may insist that injuries and fatalities stemming from partaking in those sports have affirmed their virulent nature. On that account, such sports should be forbidden. Nevertheless, this claim is not attested, as deaths in violent sports are statistically rare, occurring only slightly more frequently than in other sports. Even if the mortality rate were substantially higher, a ban on those sports would be a violation of personal liberty. No one is forced into boxing, wrestling, or watching the matches; it is of their free will to do so. Thus, a ban could stir up opposition from fans, and they could try all means to either reverse the ban or play and watch in secrecy. As a saying goes, "forbidden fruit is the sweetest", those sports could appear furtively on the black market, possibly with a dearth of safety measures that further exacerbate the problem.
In conclusion, I firmly hold my stance of opposing a ban on violent sports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: CONSENSUS_OF_OPINION[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...ance in today’s civilization, notably a consensus of opinion suggesting prohibition of such activiti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, in addition, in conclusion, by and large, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45633802817 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05195375812 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642253521127 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6629351675 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.611111111 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26861149099 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719325063994 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413835002451 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127322784526 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616923652141 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.