Thanks to immense innnovations in the field of science and technology, especially Internet and broadband connections, the concept of online courses has been made possible. Although I believe that up to a certain extent are there benefits in this new invention over traditional classes, I do not think it reduces their importance.
It is clear that distance learning has some upsides over conventional classrooms. One of the clearest of them is the flexibility for trainees, due to the fact that most online courses are compiled into videos and uploaded to the course providers’ website, which can be rewatched with a simple click if needed, along with the unneccesity to gather at school at certain time for class, allowing flexible schedules for the student. Besides, studying at home also helps to create a comfortable environment for the student, boosting their results. Online classes elinimates the need to commute between school and home, saving time and petrol costs. Some examples of online courses provider sites are Udemy, Coursera, Udacity, Skillshare and so on, providing trainees with different skills needed for their career within their freetime. All of those provide a chance for student to have a better schedule for their study, achieving the best results.
However, despite the benefits of distance learning over traditional schools, it does not mean that those schools are rendered useless. The supply of equipments and laboratories, which is essential for practice-intensive subjects such as engineering, mechanics, chemistry,… cannot be satisfied by online courses, which makes this style of education unsuitable. In addition to this, lack of Peer-to-peer and face-to-face interaction is a another major drawback of online courses, which, on the other hand, also is a factor for improving student’s studying efficiency. Inadequate social interactions are not bringing benefits to the students’ result. Furthermore, flexibility is also a trade-off, in which a great amount of self-motivation is required for students to keep up with the lessons during studying through the Internet within the comfort of their home.
In conclusion, even though e-learning helps students to better adapt their study into their schedule, the role of traditional classes is not replaced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...rtain extent are there benefits in this new invention over traditional classes, I do not thin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'courses'' or 'course's'?
Suggestion: courses'; course's
...d petrol costs. Some examples of online courses provider sites are Udemy, Coursera, Uda...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...uch as engineering, mechanics, chemistry,… cannot be satisfied by online courses, ...
^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-to-peer and face-to-face interaction is a another major drawback of online cours...
^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...o-peer and face-to-face interaction is a another major drawback of online course...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52124645892 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05392947624 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594900849858 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8958471543 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.214285714 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187769745062 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620691098288 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045261110126 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961771343866 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070081643289 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.