The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

The three pie charts show the average percentage intake of three different types of nutrients on four normal meals in the day in the USA, in which excessive intake would be harmful.

Overall, people consume less than one-fifth of those nutrients in their breakfast, which is the least amount, while they are mostly found in dinner and snacks meals.

Regarding sodium consumption, nearly half of this nutrient type is consumed in breakfast meals. Following next was about one-third eaten for lunch meal, the rest 28% of sodium intake is divided equally for breakfast and snacks. The proportions for each meal’s consumption of saturated fat are quite similar to that of sodium, with over one-third intaken in dinner, 26%, 21% for lunch and snack. The rest 16% is eaten in breakfast.

On the other hand, the percentages for the last pie chart are quite different from the previous one. In contrast to being one of the least consumed nutrients for snacks, added sugar comprised of over 40% of this meal. The next meal with the highest consuming of this nutrient is lunch and dinner, with 19% and 23% respectively. Interestingly, the percentage for added sugar consumption in breakfast was quite similar to that of sodium and saturated fat.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, third, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.038647343 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61168195506 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9897548175 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163236396914 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072089809398 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080045046599 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122080472718 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108945249343 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.