The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table compares accumulated export valuation of certain products in two separate years 2009 and 2010.
Overall export values went up by 20% as the value of most products saw noticeable increases. It is worth highlighting that equipment by far generated the most export revenue, while metals export saw unsurpassed upswing over the two-year period.
Overseas sales of equipment was of topmost value in 2009, amounted to 10.3 billions and witnessed 13% increase to 11.6 billions in the next year, accounting for roughly one third of the total sum in both years (32 billions and 38.4 billions respectively). Such dominance was overtaken by the jump of 61% of revenue collected through telecommunity exports from 7.9 to 12.7 billions in 2010. While only accounting for less than 10% of total exports, metals remain the only product with a twofold rise from 2.3 to 5.1 billions.
There only exist two exports that underwent a downturn in revenue, starting with similar figures at 6 billions and 5.5 billions for clothing and manufacturing respectively before falling down to 5 billions and 4 billions for each.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13186813187 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76776954297 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2109728557 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132893087604 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791936598682 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630300793852 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102155263647 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670024006633 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13186813187 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76776954297 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2109728557 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132893087604 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791936598682 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630300793852 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102155263647 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670024006633 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.