SThe government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress.
To what extent do you agree?
Nowadays, the education system has a huge role in the development of a country. some people think that a nation will benefit more if other subjects such as human rights and foreign languages are also emphasized, as the world is becoming more globalized. And there may be some merit in this view. Yet, in what follows it will be argued that to promote the evolution of a country the authorities should spend more money on teaching sciences, as learning science makes students more creative and there are still lots of mysteries in science that need to be solved.
spending more resources on learning science can lead to having a generation that is more creative, which is vital for a country. Currently, to be successful one needs to make new things, things that haven’t been made before. While studying scientific subjects like physics, chemistry, and astronomy children learn to think differently and can master in making new equipment. For instance, kids learning about solar energy can later come up to discover a new source of energy. Thus, it is better to encourage them to study science.
Although now science is developing quickly, there are still lots of unknown fields. We have little knowledge about galaxies, the way that the human brain works, etc. For example, there are several diseases that still are untreatable. Part of this issue can be solved by allocating more funding to doing medical research. However, it will not be beneficial if students prefer to study only the things that have been discovered before them rather than creating something new or adding even a little to existing materials.
In conclusion, it was shown that giving more funding to subjects related to science has more advantages instead of teaching other subjects because sciences enable students to be more creative, and there is a need to make more discoveries due to sciences. Though the modern world needs other fields as well to progress, studying sciences is the key to achieving m
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...e role in the development of a country. some people think that a nation will benefit...
^^^^
Line 1, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries in science that need to be solved. spending more resources on learning scie...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Spending
...science that need to be solved. spending more resources on learning science can ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, there are several diseases that still are untreatable. Part of this issue can ...
^^
Line 11, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it was shown that giving more funding to subjects related to science has more ad...
^^
Line 11, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... funding to subjects related to science has more advantages instead of teaching ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05135951662 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63770273991 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561933534743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7514258401 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251748994081 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069514514781 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650279789526 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154061124269 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608906261864 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.