Students in schools should learn practical skills like car maintenance and managing a bank accounts to academic subjects. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that students should be taught practical skills along with academic knowledge. I disagree with the statement, because of the tightening academic schedule students do not have enough time to spend their time to learn practical skills in the schools.
The main reason behind it not to include practical skill learning as a subject in school because of the academic subject’s time schedule. In a school, students have to attend daily classes, weekly quizzes, monthly and semester exams. Besides this, they have to assignment at home. So, due to this academic activity, they have no extra time to learn practical skills. In addition to this, now, many schools have made extracurricular activities, like cultural activities and sports, play as their compulsory subject. As a result, whenever a student gets some spare time then he or she has to spend it on these activities. Thus, they have no extra time schedule for learning practical skills in schools.
Furthermore, practical skills cannot be learned by reading books, a person can acquire it only by facing real-life problems. Therefore, opening a bank account and managing it does not require any academic knowledge, it’s a basic need which can be learned without the help of academic knowledge. In addition to this, nowadays, there are numerous specialized vehicle shops are available, so learning car maintenance and repairing is waste of time and burdensome for a student. For this reason, practical skills should not be included as an academic subject.
To sum up, including practical skills learning in school as an extra subject will create a more critical situation and also create more difficulties for the students. So, it should be avoided to add it to schools.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21908127208 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8015430363 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558303886926 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7246942687 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342102961263 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113633267555 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607564219628 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211007424647 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665147065137 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.