studies show that criminals get a low level of education. Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Crime often comes in tandem with illiteracy in a community. One school of thought is of the opinion that educating criminals while doing time will lessen the rate of recidivism since it makes criminals more employable . My sentiment is on pair with this opinion. This will be proven by looking at some possible benefits of this solution.
Firstly, vocational education is usually hailed as a key to prevent prison inmates from coming into contact with the law again. Based on global statistics, prison inmates who acquired some necessary occupational skills reveal a relevantly lower law infringement after resuming their ordinary lives. The reason seems clear: having access to secure job positions and earning substantially obviates the need to break the law to live a life.
Secondly, learning can change people's mindset as it is proven that our brain is plastic enough even after maturity. It has been scientifically proven that humans' brain is able to be reshaped over the lifespan. The provenance of a majority of these criminals is penniless families who could not afford a decent education before being handcuffed. Believing in the ability of these criminals, especially those of petty crimes, makes it fair enough to be exposed to education as a way for rehabilitation. Thus, the opportunity to introduce prisoners to a new perception of life should be embraced by authorities.
By contrast, prison education programs are not without opposition and there is often little public sympathy for prisoners. Arguments made against prison education mostly include that inmates do not deserve the right to be educated; doing so is being "soft on crime", and that it is a waste of taxpayers' money. However, it should be noted that this provided training is a rewarding remedy which might save more than it costs since it is can bring criminals to repentance.
To conclude, prison education not only can change an individual's personality but also it will teach them some necessary skills to work after their release. Hence, this will reduce recidivism as a prior goal of incarceration, so it seems advisable to fund such a means in order to keep communities safe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-28 | kamalena | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 67 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, aunt, uncle, cousins) now is less important than it was in the past. 76
- Essay Smart devices have put all of the world’s information at our fingertips. The benefits of this development are obvious, but what are the drawbacks? has been updated. 78
- Are you against or in favour of boarding schools? 89
- Some believe the primary purpose of museums is to entertain people while others believe their purpose is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 81
- studies show that criminals get a low level of education. Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...since it makes criminals more employable . My sentiment is on pair with this opini...
^^
Line 9, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...prison education not only can change an individuals personality but also it will teach them...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17514124294 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88791337165 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0015570631 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.764705882 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206211466207 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05732758588 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365657551157 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105601161841 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224619959358 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.