Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Advanced technology has allowed us to use electronic devices for learning from home. Few individuals would argue that this is less effective than studying with classmates at school. I agree with this statement and the reason behind it will be stated in upcoming paragraphs.
On the one hand, it is understandable that studying online may bring about many advantages such as convenience and freedom. With people who live far away from their schools, online classrooms can save their time since it is accessible anywhere with internet connection. In addition, learn from home reduces stress and tension while studying, especially with students who is free-spirited and do not like sitting in a limited space.
On the other hand, learning with a group in a classroom bring about tremendous positive affects. Firstly, it will avoid distraction as students are required to have full focus on the lecture. This will be critical for teachers to assess the student's attitude and performance. Furthermore, students can gain productivity as they become more engaged in taught sessions. Secondly, studying at school encourages learners to have social interaction with their peers and teachers. Group activity and class discussion provokes students to share their ideas and communicate with each other. This not only boosts their energy but also strengthens their soft skills such as communication, teamwork or critical thinking.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that studying on school sites has a vital role in students learning ability and productivity. Thus, I opine this statement in a positive view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... be critical for teachers to assess the students attitude and performance. Furthermore, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.412 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92292729981 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7767726875 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232998174549 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073175386374 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396302783096 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13599963847 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427758862244 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.