Subjects at school are selected by authorities such as the central government (not by the teachers). Some say that these subjects should be chosen by teachers. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this day and age, one school of thought holds that the government should take responsibility for designing the school syllabus. However, some commentators contend that school teachers have enough ability to make their own curriculum. I would partly agree with both views.
On the one hand, it is of great importance that a homogenous curriculum under government institution’s supervision should be applied for all education system. The key driving force behind this trend is that policymakers could strictly manage and provide their children with the most appropriate studying contents, which are forced to follow moral values so as to help the kids become an exemplary citizen in future. Furthermore, the fact that the subjects chosen by teachers will depend on their personal ability and viewpoint makes the government hard to control the qualification and standards. In addition, while the vast majority of teachers only own basic teaching skills, most of pedagogical professors working for the country administrator have high expert in not only practical but theoretical knowledge to make decision of which understanding areas should be educated at school.
On the other hand, it is teachers who are directly exposed to learners that can comprehend their most prominent demands. Taking Vietnam for example, some special subjects as Mathematics or Literature always play an evitable role in final-year learning program as students must take part in the entrance examination for university or higher tertiary system. As a result, teachers usually attempt to balance the studying time spent on core majors and other semi-subjects like Martial Arts or Drawing.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that both authorities and teaches should be considered as outstanding factors influencing on how to select learning subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...which are forced to follow moral values so as to help the kids become an exemplary citiz...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...lp the kids become an exemplary citizen in future. Furthermore, the fact that the subject...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to program'
Suggestion: to program
...an evitable role in final-year learning program as students must take part in the entra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5231316726 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01257270132 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64768683274 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3534485548 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.090909091 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244672342428 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847496241961 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346332140808 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138456575035 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392742994261 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.