Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Taking for granted that sports have become enormously popular because they make a substantial profit. Hence, a vigorous debate has been sparked over whether it is reasonable that sportsmen earn a large amount of money or not. In my opinion, it is unreasonable that sportsmen gain high salaries and other professions earn a small amount of money.
On the one hand, the advocates believe that it seems rational for sports professionals to receive an exorbitant salary. This is because they attract a broad audience to watch them playing with their clubs, and these audiences buy a considerable number of tickets which lead their clubs to earn a great deal of money. Thus, players earn higher wages. Moreover, due to their consummate skills as well as their natural aptitude, they are wildly popular among people. Therefore, they sign a contract with the world's leading brands which helps them to receive an unreasonable salary.
On the other hand, those that opponents think that this is unfair, for there are other professions, such as doctors, teachers and soldiers, that make a considerable contribution to the society. For instance, soldiers more likely to lose their lives at any minute in order to protect their country against the enemies. Albeit their sacrifice, they receive low salary comparing with sports professionals. By raising their salaries, their important roles will be appreciated. As a result, other occupations deserve to receive a higher pay as sports professionals because not only do they make valiant efforts but they also make diligent attempts.
In conclusion, I contend that it is inequitable according to principles of equality and justice due to sportsmen earn a large quantity of money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23826714801 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80551176638 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599277978339 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3090460457 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165352492245 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552086457312 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528151759987 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926663033193 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034034853619 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.