Task 2: Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is common for people to perceive that macro matters such as employment, inflation, etc could only be solved by the government. However, many hold that residents can still contribute to aspects like the environment. In my opinion, I strongly agree that both governments and individuals should share responsibility for environmental protection.
Some environmental issues are in considerable scope that require strict and immediate governments' actions. Serious problems, such as global warming, pollution issues, and so on require the efforts and cooperation of politicians and large environmental organizations to be effectively addressed. For example, in 2018, Formosa factory dumped tons of untreated waste directly into the sea, caused severe pollution and damaged the surroundings creating a controversial topic with society. However, thanks to political intervention, the Formosa factory was forced to accept responsibility for the consequences. Furthermore, the government could create television programs to educate citizens and persuade them to care more about the environment. Individuals who are aware of the consequences of their actions may try to change their ways in order to avoid harming the environment. In VN, many programs on VTV3 concerning endangered animals have successfully stimulated the residents' responsibilities and awareness to preserve them.
However, without an individual's participation, hardly could the government's policies be implemented flourishingly.
People can help the environment by conducting things like planting more trees and recycling trash. Nowadays, households normally raise at least two or three plants according to the national encouragement. Besides, if individuals continue to damage the environment, governments will be unable to address the issue. For example, the government always encourages people by putting banners with slogans to make people stop throwing trash on the street and dispose of it properly, but some people still do it which makes the problem become more complicated.
To summarize, preventing the environment from being polluted is both politicians and citizens work. To prevent the earth from becoming polluted, all must work together to achieve the common goal of reducing environmental damage.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...y be solved by the government. However, many hold that residents can still contribute to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1029, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilities and awareness to preserve them. However, without an individuals particip...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...preserve them. However, without an individuals participation, hardly could the governm...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... policies be implemented flourishingly. People can help the environment by condu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, as for, at least, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92727272727 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32353933063 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0450470566 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.058823529 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163748462016 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498159996387 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443830474366 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854083267445 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322965271398 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...y be solved by the government. However, many hold that residents can still contribute to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1029, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilities and awareness to preserve them. However, without an individuals particip...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...preserve them. However, without an individuals participation, hardly could the governm...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... policies be implemented flourishingly. People can help the environment by condu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, as for, at least, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92727272727 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32353933063 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0450470566 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.058823529 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163748462016 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498159996387 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443830474366 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854083267445 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322965271398 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.