It is generally claimed that the main group of museums or historical sites visitors are tourists, but not local people. This essay will examine the cause of this occurrence as well as discuss a possible approach to urge more local people to visit these places.
Exhibitions being monotonous is a primary cause of this case. The vast majority of local people must already visit the museum or the historical sites in their area; the exhibitions in these places are kept intact and unchanged. As the result, the local people will surely have no interest to explore the museum where they have already viewed all exhibitions before. On the other hand, numerous tourists never having come before are curious and enthusiastic to appreciate these unseen exhibitions. Thus, as the number of new tourists increase yearly, but the number of local people remain steady. This is the reason why this case comes about.
Holding more special events and workshop sessions are the best solution. The museums or the historical sites should keep changing the theme or opening a workshop that allows people to partake. Consequently, these will not only stimulate more attention from the substantial number of tourists but also bolster the local visitor's rate. For instance, according to my volunteer experience as a front desk at the Maritime Museum in Victoria, BC, I discovered that weekly workshop sessions can attract the number of local people to visit the museum. Evidently, over 80 % of workshop participants are the local people.
To conclude, the administrators of the museum and other historical sites should apply the interesting event to the schedule in order to capture visitors’ interest and attention. I firmly believe that if they follow this method, the rate of both tourists and local visitors will definitely grow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'having' and 'come'.
Suggestion: having never come
...e. On the other hand, numerous tourists never having come before are curious and enthusiastic to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...steady. This is the reason why this case comes about. Holding more special eve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19661016949 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68243881475 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538983050847 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3853829793 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467215901351 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144246289982 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733909731188 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276018764935 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903827211951 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.